The South African Democratic Constitution, enacted in 1996, was meant to address the injustices of apartheid. While leaders like Ramaphosa recognise its importance, we must question its effectiveness amid widespread public discontent.
In many instances, this constitution has become a source of frustration for the very people it aims to empower. It often clashes with the core beliefs and customs of marginalised communities and has at times shielded wrongdoers from accountability. Moreover, its insistence that a man-made document supersedes the revered values of the majority poses a grave concern.
The focus on gender, children’s, and LGBTQ+ rights, while important, has often overshadowed the fundamental issue of human dignity that was stripped away during apartheid. The true liberation struggle was about reclaiming this dignity, not merely redefining social constructs.
This constitution prioritises the image of South Africa over the genuine needs of its citizens, leading to a society increasingly burdened by challenges. A few appointed judges wield near-divine authority, often overlooking the voices of the people.
The solution lies in amending the Constitution to reflect the values and beliefs of the South African populace. We must redefine "we" in the context of a democracy that serves its people. South Africa deserves a constitution that embodies justice and equality rather than one that has become a misguided idol.| Khotso K. D. Moleko, Mangaung